[TEST] Daily Market Technical Analysis

Market indices show maturing uptrends; SPY and QQQ exhibit recent bearish RSI divergences and high-volume pullbacks, indicating further upward momentum will likely face headwinds. A period of consolidation or pullback is more likely. Small-cap (IWM) outperformance is likely to continue, while the VIX remains elevated with a roughly even chance of retesting highs or declining. In commodities, precious metals display strong bullish momentum but are deeply overbought, suggesting a roughly even chance of near-term consolidation, contrasting with probable bearish continuation in industrial and energy sectors. Longer-duration bonds are experiencing probable short-term bearish reversals. Overall market breadth indicates cautious sentiment, favoring defensive sectors and selective tech growth, as other cyclical areas face headwinds.

Market Indices

An examination of the provided daily percent change data for the selected ETFs reveals a uniformly positive market session. The following matrix organizes these symbols by their respective gains, from highest to lowest:

SymbolDaily Percent Change
IWM0.980%
IJR0.845%
QQQ0.706%
OEF0.574%
SPY0.444%
MDY0.091%

Regarding market breadth, all six symbols, representing various market capitalizations and indices, advanced during the trading period. This indicates a robust level of participation across these key segments, with zero declining symbols observed within this specific dataset. This breadth condition is generally associated with a healthy market environment, and it is likely to be perceived as a positive technical signal for short-term sentiment.

Delving into the relative performance, the Russell 2000 (IWM) emerged as the strongest performer with a gain of 0.980%, closely followed by the S&P SmallCap 600 (IJR) at 0.845%. This suggests that smaller capitalization stocks were providing significant leadership for the day. The Nasdaq 100 (QQQ) also exhibited notable strength, posting a 0.706% gain, which is a likely indication of continued momentum in growth-oriented sectors. In contrast, the S&P 500 (SPY) and S&P MidCap 400 (MDY) registered more modest advances of 0.444% and 0.091%, respectively. MDY’s performance, while positive, notably lags the broader group, suggesting a comparatively weaker showing for mid-cap stocks on this particular day. This divergence in strength is a pattern worth monitoring.

Based solely on this single day’s data, the collective advance across small-cap, large-cap, and tech-heavy indices suggests a broadly positive short-term momentum. It is likely that the market, as represented by these ETFs, experienced a buying bias, particularly in smaller and growth-oriented segments. However, one day’s data provides only a snapshot. While the overwhelming breadth of advancing symbols is a favorable technical observation, the relatively subdued performance of mid-caps (MDY) compared to their peers presents a roughly even chance of either a temporary anomaly or a potential early signal of selective strength rather than uniform market exuberance. A more sustained period of observation would be necessary to confirm if this pattern of small-cap and tech leadership, coupled with mid-cap underperformance, is likely to persist or if overall market strength is set to become more uniformly distributed.

Good morning traders,

Our two-day review of key broad market exchange-traded funds (ETFs) reveals a period characterized by initial strong upward momentum, followed by varying degrees of conviction and potential consolidation signals. On the first day, the market, as represented by SPY, QQQ, IWM, IJR, MDY, and OEF, exhibited broad-based bullish strength, with all instruments closing near their daily highs on notable volume. This price action suggests a concerted buying effort establishing a positive short-term trajectory for the indices.

On the second day, a general continuation of this bullish sentiment was observed as all instruments gapped up at the open. However, the subsequent price action presented a nuanced picture. SPY and OEF, representing larger capitalization segments, closed higher for the second consecutive day, although both formed upper wicks suggesting some profit-taking or resistance encountered near their intraday highs. Volume for SPY decreased, which is often indicative of slowing momentum following a strong move, while OEF’s volume slightly increased, suggesting continued, albeit moderated, buying interest. QQQ, the Nasdaq 100 proxy, also closed higher but formed a more pronounced upper shadow, with its close significantly off its daily high and below its open, indicative of strong selling pressure emerging after the gap-up. This suggests buying exhaustion or significant resistance is likely forming around the higher price levels for the technology-heavy index, with declining volume reinforcing this observation.

Looking at the mid and small-cap segments, IWM (Russell 2000) and IJR (S&P SmallCap 600) both gapped up and closed higher on the second day. However, both formed relatively small-bodied candles compared to the previous day’s robust advance, indicating a period of indecision. IWM’s volume slightly increased despite the smaller body, suggesting a roughly even chance of continued contested buying and selling at these levels. IJR’s volume decreased significantly, which, combined with the indecisive candle, suggests that the upward momentum is likely decelerating, increasing the probability of consolidation or a minor pullback.

MDY (S&P MidCap 400) presented the most notable sign of potential reversal among the group. After a strong bullish day one, MDY gapped up significantly on day two but subsequently closed with a dark body candle, well below its opening price and significantly off its intraday high, despite closing marginally above its prior day’s close. This “bearish engulfing”-like pattern (relative to the day’s open) on decreasing volume is a likely indication of strong selling pressure emerging from the gap, increasing the probability of a short-term reversal or at least a period of downward pressure for the mid-cap index.

In summary, while the market demonstrated strong short-term upward momentum across the board over the two-day period, the second day’s action suggests that this momentum may be facing increasing challenges. It is likely that large-cap indices like SPY and OEF may continue their ascent, albeit with potential for reduced conviction. Conversely, QQQ, IWM, and IJR are showing increasing signs of indecision or exhaustion, making a period of consolidation or a minor pullback roughly an even chance. MDY, in particular, exhibits a higher probability of a short-term bearish reversal given the distinct candlestick pattern observed on the second day. Traders should monitor these divergences closely for potential shifts in the near-term market trend.

Performance heatmap showing comparative returns for SPY, QQQ, IWM, IJR, MDY, OEF over 2days timeframe

Performance Heatmap (SPY, QQQ, IWM, IJR, MDY, OEF)

Generated for 2days timeframe analysis

SPY Technical Analysis: Navigating a Mature Uptrend with Cautionary Signals

The SPY ETF has exhibited a robust upward trend over the past 90 trading days, with the price advancing from approximately 599.72 on June 9th to 665.17 by October 15th. This sustained ascent has been punctuated by periods of consolidation and two notable, high-volume price declines. The initial rally in June led to a consolidation phase, followed by renewed strength through July and most of August, establishing a resistance zone around 630-635. A significant high-volume pullback on August 1st, where the price dropped from 632.08 to 621.72 with over 140 million shares traded, suggested strong selling pressure. However, the ETF managed to recover, setting new highs into September and early October, reaching an all-time high of 673.95 on October 10th before experiencing another sharp, high-volume decline to 653.02, closing with over 156 million shares traded. Currently, SPY has recovered some of these losses, trading near the 665 level. This price action suggests that while the overarching trend remains positive, significant pullbacks are met with substantial volume, indicating strong participant reactions at critical junctures.

Analysis of the 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reveals a pattern of frequent entries into overbought territory (above 70) during periods of strong rallies, indicating robust bullish momentum. For instance, the RSI climbed into the low 70s in late June/early July, mid-September, and early October, corresponding with price advances. However, a significant bearish divergence has emerged recently. While SPY recorded successively higher highs (e.g., approximately 667 on September 22nd, 672 on October 6th, and 673.95 on October 10th), the RSI demonstrated lower peaks (73.70 on September 22nd, 71.17 on October 6th, and 65.75 on October 9th, preceding the day’s high). This divergence, where price makes a new high but momentum does not confirm it, typically signals weakening upward thrust and increases the likelihood of a price correction. Following this divergence, the sharp decline on October 10th brought the RSI down significantly to 41.81, indicating a rapid release of previously overbought conditions. The current RSI reading of 54.11 suggests that momentum is no longer overbought, residing in a neutral zone.

It is imperative to note that although MACD (13, 21-day) was specified for analysis, the provided market data only includes candle and RSI information. Consequently, no technical assessment of MACD crossovers, divergences, or histogram patterns can be conducted based solely on the data furnished. This absence limits our ability to cross-reference momentum signals and potential trend shifts that MACD typically provides, which could have offered additional confirmation or conflicting evidence to the RSI and price action observations.

Considering both price action and RSI, the immediate outlook for SPY warrants caution despite the prevailing uptrend. The confirmed bearish RSI divergence preceding the sharp October 10th pullback, coupled with the high volume observed during both significant declines, suggests that further upward momentum is likely to face substantial headwinds. A retest of the recent all-time high zone around 670-674 is probable, but a sustained breakout to new highs without some consolidation or a deeper corrective phase is unlikely in the near term. Should SPY fail to overcome the 670-674 resistance, there is a roughly even chance of a retest of the support established by the October 10th low near 653. A break below this level would increase the probability of a further retracement towards the 640-645 area. Therefore, while the long-term trend appears to be bullish, the short-term technical indicators suggest that the upward momentum is decelerating, implying that a period of consolidation or a pullback is more likely than an immediate, strong continuation of the rally.

SPY Price & Indicators (RSI_14_DAY, MACD_13_21_DAY)

QQQ Technical Analysis (2025-06-09 to 2025-10-15)

Over the past 90 days, QQQ has exhibited a discernible uptrend, characterized by a series of higher highs and higher lows that propelled the instrument from approximately in early June to a peak near in early October. This bullish momentum was intermittently punctuated by periods of consolidation or minor pullbacks. A significant price peak was observed on 2025-10-09 at .61. This upward trajectory was abruptly interrupted on 2025-10-10, when QQQ experienced a sharp decline from an open of .40 to a close of .50. This notable market event was accompanied by exceptionally high volume of 94.4 million shares, representing the highest trading volume in the observed period and strongly suggesting a significant shift in short-term market dynamics. Subsequent trading sessions have seen QQQ attempt a recovery, fluctuating around the level, but without decisively regaining the pre-drop highs.

The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) generally confirmed the bullish price action throughout the analysis period. The RSI frequently entered overbought territory (above 70) in late June, late July, and most notably from late September into early October, peaking at 75.35 on 2025-09-22. These elevated RSI readings often coincided with, or immediately preceded, price consolidation phases. The most critical RSI movement occurred on 2025-10-10, mirroring the price decline, where the indicator plunged from 69.27 to 45.42. This rapid descent from a bullish momentum zone into neutral territory, coinciding with the high-volume price drop, strongly suggests a significant and sudden deceleration of buying pressure and an increase in selling conviction. The RSI has since consolidated between approximately 52 and 55, indicating that while the intense selling pressure has abated, a strong resumption of bullish momentum above the 50 midline has not yet been established.

It is important to note that the MACD 13-21 day indicator, while requested, cannot be incorporated into this analysis as the necessary data was not provided. Based exclusively on the available price action and RSI data, the recent price behavior, specifically the high-volume breakdown on 2025-10-10 from the preceding uptrend, likely signals a significant shift in market sentiment for QQQ. The failure of price to definitively reclaim its pre-10/10 levels, coupled with the RSI struggling to sustain above the 50 mark, suggests that the immediate upward trajectory has been interrupted.

Given the current technical posture, it is likely that QQQ will experience continued volatility as market participants re-evaluate its direction following the recent sharp decline. We might expect QQQ to establish a new trading range, with immediate resistance near the prior high around and potential support around the - level (the 2025-10-10 low). An alternative scenario, with a roughly even chance, involves a more substantial short-term correction if the - support level fails to hold. Conversely, a rapid reclaim of the level on increasing volume, accompanied by the RSI returning to consistently bullish readings, would suggest a resumption of the prior uptrend, although the probability of this occurring in the immediate short-term appears unlikely without further evidence of renewed buying strength.

QQQ Price & Indicators (RSI_14_DAY, MACD_13_21_DAY)

Technical Analysis: iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM)

Over the past 90 days, the iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has exhibited a discernible uptrend, advancing from approximately in early June to closing at .33 on October 15th. This analysis focuses on price action, volume, and the 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI), noting that data for the MACD (13,21-day) indicator, while specified, was not provided for detailed examination. The initial phase of this period saw IWM consolidate around the - range in mid-June before commencing a rally that carried prices to a July peak near . A subsequent pullback in late July found support around -, solidifying this as a short-term base. The momentum then accelerated through August and September, forming a series of higher highs and higher lows, with the - zone establishing itself as a significant support area after a notable surge in late August. Most recently, from October 10th, after touching a low of .56 on significantly higher volume (69.6 million shares), IWM has executed a robust rebound, culminating in a strong close above on October 15th. This recent price action suggests strong buying interest re-emerged after the brief dip.

The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) provides further insight into momentum and potential overbought/oversold conditions. During the early July rally, RSI reached an overbought level of 71.57 on July 3rd, preceding a subsequent price consolidation. A similar overbought condition was observed on September 18th, with RSI at 71.23, which was followed by a moderate price correction. The most recent RSI data shows a significant drop from 68.07 on October 6th to 44.97 on October 10th, coinciding with the price dip to .56. This rapid decline moved RSI from a strong momentum zone to near the lower boundary of the neutral range, suggesting a temporary weakening of buying pressure. However, the subsequent swift recovery in RSI to 62.99 by October 15th, while not yet in overbought territory, indicates a robust return of positive momentum. The strong rebound in RSI from the mid-40s region, coupled with the price rally, suggests that the previous pullback likely served to alleviate some overbought pressure without disrupting the broader uptrend.

Considering the robust price action and the supportive RSI recovery, it is likely that IWM will attempt to consolidate or extend its recent gains in the near term. The current momentum, as indicated by the sharp upward move over the past few days following the October 10th dip, suggests buyers remain in control. The prior resistance around .475 on October 6th has been surpassed, which now probably functions as short-term support. An alternative scenario involves a potential short-term pullback or consolidation. While the RSI has rebounded sharply, it is not yet in extreme overbought territory, reducing the immediate probability of a reversal from that indicator. Should IWM encounter selling pressure, a retest of the - level, which previously acted as resistance in late September, could occur. A sustained close below this level would increase the likelihood of a deeper correction towards the - range. However, based solely on the provided price action, volume, and RSI data, the overall technical posture of IWM remains bullish, making the probability of continued upward movement higher than that of an immediate significant decline.

IWM Price & Indicators (RSI_14_DAY, MACD_13_21_DAY)

VIX Fear Index

The VIX technical data over the past seven trading days indicates a distinct shift from a period of lower volatility to a significantly elevated regime. Prior to 2025-10-10, the VIX likely operated within a relatively stable range, generally closing between 16.30 and 17.24. However, the price action on 2025-10-10, characterized by a substantial bullish candle that saw the VIX surge from an open of 16.36 to a close of 21.66, strongly suggests a sharp and decisive shift into a higher volatility environment. The subsequent days have seen the VIX maintain these elevated levels, indicating that market participants are likely pricing in a heightened degree of uncertainty.

Following the volatility surge, the VIX experienced a notable pullback on 2025-10-13, with an open at 19.45 after the prior day’s close of 21.66, and closing at 19.03. This constitutes a significant gap down, which might suggest some immediate relief in market apprehension. However, this relief was likely temporary, as the VIX gapped up again on 2025-10-14, opening at 21.46 and eventually closing at 20.81. The most recent trading day, 2025-10-15, saw the VIX open at 20.02 and close higher for the day at 20.64, forming a bullish candle. Despite this intraday strength, the closing price was marginally lower than the previous day’s close, evidenced by the -0.8169% daily change, suggesting that the immediate upward momentum may be moderating as the VIX consolidates within this elevated range.

Near-term technical levels bear close observation for the VIX’s future trajectory. The highs observed around 22.44 on 2025-10-10 and 22.94 on 2025-10-14 are likely to act as a significant resistance zone. A sustained breakout above these levels would indicate a further, more pronounced increase in market anxiety, making a push towards higher volatility levels likely. Conversely, the 19.03 level (2025-10-13 close) and 19.11 (2025-10-15 intraday low) appear to provide an initial support zone within the current elevated range. A decisive break below this support, especially if sustained, would make a retreat towards the pre-spike 16-17 range more likely, signaling a potential return to lower perceived market risk.

Considering the recent consolidation within an elevated range, there is roughly an even chance for the VIX to either attempt to retest its recent highs or to begin to fall back towards its established support. The pattern of significant daily gaps and broad trading ranges indicates continued sensitivity to market events, and volatility itself is likely to remain elevated in the immediate term.

VIX Technical Analysis: October 15, 2025

The VIX has experienced a period of heightened volatility and a general upward trend in expected market turbulence over the past 90 days, culminating in a significant surge in early October. From a low point near 14.00 in mid-August, the VIX has progressively climbed, punctuated by notable spikes. The most recent and impactful price action occurred on October 10th, when the VIX surged to a high of 22.44, closing at 21.66. This marked the highest close within the observed 90-day data, indicating a substantial increase in short-term market uncertainty expectations. Following this peak, the VIX saw a minor retracement to 19.03 on October 13th, only to rebound and close at 20.64 on October 15th, suggesting persistent upward pressure.

Examining the VIX’s price history within this timeframe reveals a pattern of sharp upward movements followed by periods of consolidation or gradual decline before subsequent rallies. Key resistance levels appear to be forming in the 22.00-23.00 range, which has contained the most significant upward thrusts. Conversely, the 14.00-15.00 zone has demonstrated relatively strong support, serving as a floor during periods of decreased volatility expectations. The current VIX level of 20.64 positions it firmly within the upper quartile of its 90-day range, indicating elevated levels of implied volatility compared to the majority of the period.

The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) provides further insight into the momentum behind these price movements. On October 10th, concurrent with the sharp price surge, the RSI_14_DAY registered a value of 73.09. This reading signifies a distinct overbought condition, which often precedes a pause or reversal in price momentum. Historically, an RSI reading of 65.38 on August 1st, associated with a prior VIX spike, was followed by a period of VIX decline. As of October 15th, the RSI has retreated slightly to 63.32, moving out of the extreme overbought territory but still indicating robust bullish momentum. The cooling of the RSI from its peak suggests that the immediate upward pressure may be moderating.

Based on the combined technical signals, it is likely that the VIX will experience a period of consolidation or a modest pullback from its current elevated levels in the near term. The recent overbought RSI condition typically implies that buying interest may wane, leading to price stabilization or a minor correction. A plausible near-term support level could be found around the 19.00-19.50 range, which previously acted as an area of interest. However, it is possible for the VIX to re-test the recent highs in the 22.00-23.00 range if fresh impetus for volatility emerges and the RSI begins to turn upward from its current position. This alternative scenario appears less likely in the immediate aftermath of an overbought signal without a clear fundamental shift, but the overall trend of rising volatility expectations within the 90-day window warrants consideration of sustained elevated levels.

VIX Price & Indicators (RSI_14_DAY, MACD_13_21_DAY)

Tech Sector Analysis

Analysis of the 14-day QQQ/SPY ratio indicates a largely sideways trend with weak underlying strength. The ratio has traded within a narrow range, establishing a high of approximately 0.9099 on October 9th and a low of approximately 0.9005 on September 26th. The current ratio of 0.9054 places it slightly above the midpoint of this observed range, at a relative position of 0.516. The data suggests that QQQ’s relative performance against SPY has been confined, neither demonstrating significant outperformance nor underperformance over this period. The calculated volatility for this period is notably low, further emphasizing the lack of decisive directional movement in the relative strength metric.

Observing the daily fluctuations, the ratio initially climbed from its low to an interim high around 0.9051 by October 2nd, followed by a slight dip before accelerating to its peak on October 9th. This initial period suggested moderate outperformance by the technology sector. However, this was immediately followed by a sharp and significant decline to 0.9027 on October 10th, indicating a notable short-term reversal in relative strength, where SPY likely outperformed QQQ. Following this reversal, the ratio has shown a modest recovery, stabilizing around the 0.905 level. This price action suggests that attempts by QQQ to establish sustained outperformance are met with subsequent reversals, reinforcing the overall sideways character of the trend.

Given the established sideways trend and weak underlying strength, a continuation of range-bound relative performance is roughly even chance over the immediate future. A decisive breakout above the 0.9099 resistance level would likely signal renewed outperformance by QQQ, whereas a sustained break below 0.9005 would very likely indicate a period of underperformance. Without additional data beyond this 14-day window, anticipating a clear directional shift with high confidence is problematic. The recent sharp decline after hitting the high suggests potential resistance around that level, making further challenges to the peak value likely to encounter selling pressure initially.

Good morning traders, as a seasoned CMT, I’ve analyzed the 90-day performance ratio of QQQ to SPY, providing insights solely from the provided technical data. Over this period, from early June to mid-October 2025, the QQQ/SPY ratio has exhibited an overall upward trend, moving from a low of approximately 0.8827 to its current level around 0.9054. This indicates a consistent, albeit measured, outperformance of the Nasdaq 100 relative to the S&P 500. The provided trend analysis confirms this direction but qualifies its strength as “weak,” implying that while QQQ is leading, the momentum behind this leadership is not particularly robust or aggressive. The total percentage change over this period is 2.304%, which, while positive, underscores the “weak” trend strength given the duration.

Examining the recent price action, the ratio established a 90-day high of 0.9099 on October 9th. Following this peak, the ratio has experienced a slight pullback, currently trading at 0.9054, placing it approximately 83.3% of the way between its 90-day low and high. This suggests the ratio is encountering resistance at these elevated levels. There is a roughly even chance that the ratio will re-test the 0.9099 resistance in the very near term. However, given the “weak” trend strength and the initial rejection from this level, it is likely that the ratio may undergo further consolidation or a minor retracement before any sustained breakout attempt.

From a support perspective, the 90-day average ratio stands at 0.8937. This level could act as a dynamic support should the current short-term pullback extend further. Prior areas of consolidation, such as the 0.897 level seen in mid-August or the 0.900-0.902 range from late September to early October, are also likely to offer support. The reported volatility of 0.0000458 indicates that daily fluctuations in the ratio are quite small, suggesting that any significant movements, whether upward or downward, are likely to be gradual and orderly, rather than sharp and unpredictable. Consequently, rapid reversals are unlikely without a material shift in underlying technical dynamics.

Looking ahead, a decisive break above the 0.9099 resistance level would likely signal a strengthening of QQQ’s relative outperformance against SPY, potentially opening the door to new higher levels beyond the observed 90-day window. Conversely, a clear break below the average ratio of 0.8937 would suggest that SPY is likely to exhibit short-term leadership. While the overall trend remains upward, the “weak” strength and the recent resistance test imply a good chance of continued rotational shifts or consolidation within the established range, rather than an immediate, strong continuation of QQQ’s relative rally. Traders should monitor the 0.9099 resistance and 0.8937 average support levels for clues regarding the next directional bias in relative performance.

Ratio analysis chart comparing QQQ/SPY relative performance over 90days timeframe

Ratio Analysis: QQQ/SPY

Generated for 90days timeframe analysis

IWM vs. SPY

The RATIO:IWM/SPY data over the past 14 days exhibits a discernible upward trend, indicating a period of relative outperformance by the Russell 2000 (IWM) compared to the S&P 500 (SPY). Beginning at approximately 0.3647 on September 26th, the ratio briefly declined to a low of 0.3628 by October 1st. Following this brief consolidation, a consistent upward trajectory commenced. The provided trend analysis confirms this observation, identifying a moderate ‘up’ direction with a 3.20% increase over the period. The consistently low volatility of 0.000015 suggests this ascent in relative performance has been relatively steady rather than characterized by erratic fluctuations.

The strongest phase of this relative outperformance appears to be in the latter half of the observed period. From the October 1st low, the ratio ascended to 0.3675 by October 6th, then experienced a minor pull-back to 0.3649 on October 7th. However, this dip was swiftly reversed, with the ratio accelerating notably, particularly from October 10th’s 0.3641 to its current high of 0.3763 on October 15th. This current ratio also represents the period’s highest value, placing the IWM/SPY relative performance in a strong position, indicative of small-cap strength relative to large-cap.

The sustained increase in the IWM/SPY ratio over these 14 days makes it likely that small-cap stocks, represented by IWM, are currently attracting greater relative capital flows compared to the large-cap, technology-heavy SPY. This observed shift in the ratio suggests a potential rotation within the market toward smaller capitalization companies. Based on the strength and consistency of the recent upward movement, a continuation of this relative outperformance by IWM is likely in the immediate short term, provided the observed pattern sustains.

While the short-term trend strongly favors IWM’s relative outperformance, it is prudent to consider alternative scenarios. A sustained consolidation or reversal would become likely if the ratio were to fail to make new highs and instead establish a sequence of lower highs or lower lows. Given the current ratio is at the high end of the 14-day range (relative position 1), any significant decline below the recent average ratio of 0.3667 would signal a potential shift back towards SPY outperformance, making it roughly an even chance for a short-term pullback to test this average. However, based purely on the provided data, a direct and immediate reversal without further consolidation or discernible weakening of the upward price action is unlikely.

As a Chartered Market Technician with over 15 years of experience, I’ve analyzed the provided 90-day IWM/SPY ratio data to discern technical patterns and project potential future movements strictly based on the provided information. This ratio serves as a crucial gauge of small-cap (IWM) relative performance against large-cap (SPY) equities, indicating shifts in market leadership.

Over the past 90 days, the IWM/SPY ratio has established a clear, albeit moderate, upward trend, increasing by approximately 5.78% from its lower levels to its current standing. The data indicates an initial decline from 0.3558 in early June to a low of 0.3457 on August 1st. This period represents a phase of small-cap underperformance relative to large caps. However, following this trough, the ratio initiated a recovery, subsequently forming a series of higher lows and higher highs. Key support appears to have been established around the 0.345-0.349 range, preventing further relative decline and acting as a base for the ensuing rally. The average ratio over this 90-day period stands at 0.3580, suggesting the current reading is significantly above its mean, underscoring the recent bullish momentum. The observed volatility of the ratio, recorded at a low 0.00004965, implies a relatively stable and less erratic upward progression, favoring a trending environment rather than choppy, indecisive action.

The most recent data point places the IWM/SPY ratio at 0.3763, marking the highest value observed within this 90-day window, a fact confirmed by the “relative_position: 1” metric. This breakout to a new 90-day high is a technically significant development, indicating renewed or strengthening relative momentum for small-cap stocks. Such a move, occurring within an established moderate uptrend, likely signals a continuation of small-cap outperformance in the near term. The previous resistance levels, particularly around the 0.368-0.370 area seen in early October, will probably transition into new support zones if the ratio experiences any pullback.

Considering alternative scenarios, while the current momentum is bullish, a period of consolidation after reaching a new high is a roughly even chance possibility. The ratio could trade sideways to digest its recent gains before attempting a further ascent. A pullback to retest prior resistance, now acting as support around 0.368-0.370, is also a roughly even chance possibility. A sharp reversal of the entire moderate uptrend, however, appears unlikely at this juncture, given the sustained upward trajectory and the clear breakout to new relative highs observed in the most recent data. Nevertheless, traders should monitor the ratio for any signs of divergence or a failure to hold newfound support levels, which could shift the probabilities.

Ratio analysis chart comparing IWM/SPY relative performance over 90days timeframe

Ratio Analysis: IWM/SPY

Generated for 90days timeframe analysis

Commodities

SymbolDaily Percent Change
SLV3.269%
GLD1.733%
UGA1.005%
CORN0.927%
DBC0.362%
USO-0.014%
CPER-0.357%
UNG-0.586%

The daily technical data presents a mixed performance across the selected commodity-linked instruments, albeit with a notable bias towards certain sectors. Silver (SLV) exhibits the strongest advance, posting a significant gain of 3.269%. Gold (GLD) follows with a robust 1.733% increase, indicating a clear positive momentum within the precious metals segment. Agricultural commodities, represented by UGA and CORN, also show positive daily changes of 1.005% and 0.927% respectively, suggesting a moderate upward bias in those areas. The broad commodity ETF, DBC, registers a smaller gain of 0.362%, which is likely influenced by the divergent performances across its underlying constituents.

Analyzing the market breadth for these eight symbols, we observe five advancing issues and three declining issues. This 5:3 advance-decline ratio suggests a slightly positive overall sentiment for this specific basket of commodities on the day under review. The presence of more advancers than decliners indicates that positive forces were somewhat more prevalent, but the ratio is not overwhelmingly strong to signal broad, synchronized upward momentum across all commodity types. The notable strength in precious metals appears to be a primary driver of the positive breadth among the advancing group.

On the declining side, USO, representing crude oil, shows a marginal decline of -0.014%, indicating a roughly even chance of either a slight positive or negative close, ultimately settling slightly lower. Copper (CPER) and Natural Gas (UNG) experienced more pronounced declines of -0.357% and -0.586% respectively. The divergence between the strong performance of precious metals and the weaker showing in industrial metals and certain energy components is a key technical observation. This pattern suggests that market participants might be favoring defensive assets or those with inflation-hedging characteristics, while the outlook for industrial and energy demand could be perceived with less enthusiasm.

Based on this single day’s data, it is likely that momentum traders will continue to monitor the precious metals complex for further upward continuation. However, without additional data points or context regarding volume or longer-term trends, it is difficult to definitively project sustained movements. The current divergence between precious metals and some other commodity sectors creates a scenario where a rotation of capital might be occurring, or it could simply reflect short-term tactical positioning. A sustained strengthening in the advancers’ numbers, especially with increased daily percentage changes across the board, would be necessary to suggest a more entrenched bullish environment for the broader commodity market.

Commodity ETF Technical Outlook: Divergent Trends Emerge Over Two-Day Period

Analysis of the provided two-day market data for selected commodity Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) reveals a bifurcated technical landscape, with distinct directional biases emerging across different sectors. While certain assets demonstrate robust upward momentum, others exhibit signs of weakening or bearish continuation, suggesting a market characterized by sector-specific narratives rather than a unified trend. Traders should note these divergences, as they present varied opportunities and risks.

In the precious metals complex, both GLD (Gold) and SLV (Silver) exhibited strong bullish technical patterns. GLD charted two consecutive bullish candles, marked by higher highs and higher lows, and importantly, supported by increasing volume on the second day. This combination strongly suggests it is highly likely that GLD’s upward momentum will persist in the immediate future. SLV also recorded a notable two-day rally, characterized by significant bullish candles, including a gap-up on the second day, with prices consistently closing near their daily highs. While SLV’s Day 2 volume decreased relative to Day 1, the robust price action makes it likely to continue its advance, though a temporary pause or consolidation holds a roughly even chance given the volume profile.

The agricultural and broader commodity funds, including CORN, DBC (Diversified Commodities), and UGA (Gasoline), present a more nuanced picture. CORN displayed two bullish candles with consistently higher closes. However, the notable decrease in volume on the second day suggests waning conviction, implying a roughly even chance of continued ascent or a period of consolidation. Similarly, DBC recorded two bullish candles with higher closes, yet experienced a decline in volume on the second day. This pattern makes it likely that upward movement continues, but the reduced volume introduces a roughly even chance of encountering resistance or a slowdown. UGA, after a bearish Day 1, saw a strong bullish reversal on Day 2 with a significant gap up and a robust green candle. Despite this strong price action, the extremely low volume on Day 2 makes it unlikely for this rally to sustain without further volume confirmation, suggesting a roughly even chance of a pullback or continued weakness.

Conversely, several commodity sectors displayed technical weakness over the observed period. CPER (Copper) initially saw a bullish Day 1, but Day 2 presented a bearish candle closing below Day 1’s close, coupled with significantly decreased volume. This pattern makes it likely that CPER is losing its upward momentum, with a roughly even chance of further downside or a period of range-bound trading. USO (Oil) consistently printed bearish candles over both days, with Day 2 opening higher but failing to hold gains, ultimately closing slightly below the prior day’s close on decreased volume. This persistent selling pressure makes it likely that USO will experience continued weakness. UNG (Natural Gas) stands out with two consecutive bearish candles, marked by lower highs and lower lows, and crucially, increasing volume on Day 2. This combination strongly suggests it is highly likely that UNG’s bearish trend will continue.

In summary, the technical landscape across these commodity ETFs is fragmented. Precious metals exhibit robust bullish signals, supported by price and often volume. However, several other commodities show bullish price action but are undermined by decreasing volume, introducing a higher degree of uncertainty regarding the sustainability of their rallies. Crucially, industrial metals and natural gas demonstrate clear bearish continuation or reversal signals. Traders should be acutely aware of these divergent trends and prioritize volume confirmation in any potential directional plays, as the lack of conviction evident in some assets presents a roughly even chance of failed breakouts or reversals.

Performance heatmap showing comparative returns for SLV, GLD, CORN, CPER, USO, DBC, UGA, UNG over 2days timeframe

Performance Heatmap (SLV, GLD, CORN, CPER, USO, DBC, UGA, UNG)

Generated for 2days timeframe analysis

SLV has exhibited a discernible and robust uptrend over the past 90 days, transitioning from a period of relative consolidation in early summer to a powerful bullish ascent. In June and early July, the asset traded largely within a range of approximately .50 to .50, characterized by fluctuating but generally average trading volumes. A significant breakout occurred around July 10-11, where SLV’s price surged from the low to above , accompanied by a notable increase in trading volume from approximately 17 million to over 57 million shares. This volume spike during the initial breakout suggests strong buying conviction supporting the upward price movement. The bullish momentum persisted through August, September, and into October, propelling SLV to its recent close of .33 on October 15, marking a substantial advance from its earlier lows. Recent candlesticks frequently depict strong closes near their daily highs, indicating sustained buying pressure, with volume generally remaining elevated, often exceeding 30-40 million shares, which further validates the integrity of the uptrend.

The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) provides further insight into this momentum. In the initial phase of the 90-day period (June), the RSI fluctuated but predominantly remained above the 50-level, briefly touching into overbought territory (e.g., 72.45 on June 9) before receding. As SLV commenced its more significant rally in mid-July, the RSI quickly moved into overbought status, consistently registering values above 70. This trend became particularly pronounced throughout September and October, where the RSI has been persistently elevated, frequently exceeding 75 and peaking at 84.32 on October 13, concluding at 83.09 on October 15. Such sustained readings deeply within the overbought region indicate a strong, albeit potentially stretched, buying enthusiasm. While prolonged high RSI is typical during strong trends, it also suggests an increasing likelihood of a near-term consolidation or minor pullback as momentum traders might consider taking profits.

The combination of robust price appreciation, confirmed by significant trading volume, and persistently overbought RSI readings, strongly indicates a dominant bullish sentiment for SLV. The immediate trend is unequivocally upward. Given the current deeply overbought RSI (above 80), it is a roughly even chance that SLV could experience a minor corrective phase or a period of horizontal consolidation in the very near term. Such a development would be a healthy adjustment within the context of a strong uptrend, potentially allowing the RSI to cool down without necessarily signaling a reversal of the primary bullish trend. Traders should note that corrective moves in strong uptrends often find support at previous resistance levels or Fibonacci retracements.

An alternative, though currently less likely, scenario is that the intense upward momentum could continue, at least for a brief period, potentially pushing SLV towards new highs above .40. A decisive break above this recent high, especially if accompanied by sustained high volume, would likely reinforce the continuation of this aggressive upward trajectory. However, the probability of an immediate, significant downward reversal without prior consolidation or a clear breakdown in price action is assessed as unlikely in the very short term, given the current strength of the trend and momentum indicators. Key near-term support levels for SLV are likely to be found around the .00-.50 range, followed by .50-.00, which represent recent consolidation points and prior highs. Continued monitoring of the RSI for any bearish divergence or a significant break of these support levels would be prudent.

SLV Price & Indicators (RSI_14_DAY, MACD_13_21_DAY)

GLD has exhibited a robust bullish trend over the past 90 trading days, advancing significantly from approximately in early June to reach .39 at the close of October 15th, 2025. This upward trajectory is characterized by a series of higher highs and higher lows, establishing a clear primary uptrend. Volume analysis suggests a general increase in trading activity accompanying the more significant upward price movements, particularly during the late August and September acceleration, and again in early October. The price action in early October saw a substantial rally culminating in a high of .57 on October 8th, followed by a noticeable pullback to .43 on October 9th, accompanied by the highest volume observed in the dataset (33,538,644 shares). Despite this high-volume selling, the asset recovered swiftly, closing at new highs by October 15th, indicating strong underlying buying pressure. We assess that the overall price structure is indicative of a well-established and persistent upward momentum.

The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) largely corroborates the bullish narrative but also highlights potential short-term concerns. For much of the observable period, particularly from late August onwards, the RSI has frequently entered and sustained itself within overbought territory (above 70). This condition is evident in early September, late September, and extensively throughout October. While sustained overbought RSI can signify a strong trending market, the latest RSI reading of 83.00 on October 15th places GLD deep within what is traditionally considered overbought, suggesting that the asset is currently experiencing a period of intense buying. A historical pattern within this dataset shows that while GLD can remain overbought for extended periods, significant spikes in RSI often precede, or are accompanied by, brief consolidations or minor pullbacks, such as the one observed on October 9th.

Considering the recent price surge, particularly from October 6th, where GLD advanced from .16 to .39 by October 15th, the RSI climbed from 82.82 to 83.00, confirming the intensity of the buying. The high volume associated with the October 9th pullback, followed by an immediate recovery and subsequent push to new highs, indicates that buyers absorbed the selling pressure efficiently. However, the rapidity of the recent ascent and the deeply overbought RSI reading suggest that the rate of appreciation may be unsustainable in the immediate term. It is roughly even chance that GLD could experience a period of consolidation or a modest pullback in the very near future to alleviate this overbought condition, even if the primary uptrend remains intact. A failure to consolidate or pull back, despite the high RSI, could indicate an exceptionally strong trend, but such occurrences are less common without some rebalancing.

In conclusion, GLD is currently in a strong and accelerating uptrend, as evidenced by consistent higher highs and higher lows, and generally supportive volume. The RSI, while confirming the robust buying interest, is at an elevated level. Based solely on the provided data, we judge it likely that the overarching bullish trend will persist given the swift recovery from the October 9th dip. However, it is also likely that the extreme overbought condition indicated by the RSI may prompt a short-term pause or a shallow corrective move before further significant upward advancement. No MACD data was provided, therefore this analysis is limited to price, volume, and RSI.

GLD Price & Indicators (RSI_14_DAY, MACD_13_21_DAY)

Gold/Silver Ratio

The GLD/SLV ratio has exhibited a moderate downtrend over the past 14 days, decreasing by approximately 3.23% from an initial reading of 8.283 to a current value of 8.016. This price action suggests a period where silver (SLV) has generally outperformed gold (GLD). The average ratio observed during this interval was 8.239, indicating that the current ratio sits below its short-term mean.

During this two-week observation, the ratio reached a high of 8.441 on October 7th and established a low of 8.000 on October 13th. The current ratio of 8.016 is situated very near the 14-day low, representing only 3.47% of the range from the low to the high. This positioning suggests that recent selling pressure has pushed the ratio to the lower bound of its observed range, with the 8.000 level appearing to act as immediate technical support. Following the brief dip to 8.000, there was a minor rebound to 8.136 before a subsequent retracement to the current level.

Given the established moderate downtrend and the ratio’s current relative position near its 14-day low, a continued decline in the GLD/SLV ratio is likely over the immediate short-term. This would suggest further outperformance by silver relative to gold. However, a roughly even chance exists for the ratio to consolidate or experience a minor technical bounce from its current level, particularly given its proximity to the 8.000 support, which triggered a short-lived recovery previously.

For the observed downtrend to reverse, a sustained move above the average ratio of 8.239 would be required, which is unlikely in the immediate term without significant shifts in price action. The low volatility registered at 0.0165 suggests that any further decline or short-term rebound may be gradual rather than abrupt. A decisive break and close below the 8.000 level would highly likely signal a continuation of silver’s outperformance against gold, potentially targeting lower support levels not visible in this limited dataset.

GLD/SLV Ratio Technical Analysis: October 15, 2025

Our technical analysis of the GLD/SLV ratio over the past 90 days, ending October 15, 2025, indicates a robust and consistent bearish trend. The ratio, which reflects the relative performance of gold (GLD) against silver (SLV), has experienced a significant decline of approximately 12.71% from its peak. This sustained downward movement is explicitly categorized as a “strong” downtrend, characterized by lower highs and lower lows across the analyzed period. The ratio initiated the period near 9.18 and reached a high of 9.59 on June 13, subsequently trending lower to its current value of 8.0155. This consistent underperformance of GLD relative to SLV is the dominant technical theme.

The ratio’s trajectory has been largely unidirectional since mid-June, with any upward corrections proving shallow and short-lived. Notable resistance levels have formed from previous reaction highs. For instance, attempts to rally beyond the 9.2-9.4 range in late June and early July were met with selling pressure, confirming these levels as overhead supply. More recently, the ratio found temporary support around the 8.7-8.8 region in August and early September, but this was decisively broken in late September. This breakdown has shifted previous support into new resistance. The current ratio stands at 8.0155, which is notably close to the 90-day low of 8.0002 recorded on October 13, indicating a critical juncture. The low “relative_position” of 0.0096 underscores that the ratio is presently trading at the extreme lower end of its 90-day range.

Given the identified strong downtrend and the current proximity to the 90-day low, a continuation of GLD’s underperformance relative to SLV is highly likely. The immediate technical focus is on the 8.0002 level. A decisive break below this mark would represent a new 90-day low and would likely accelerate the downside momentum, as there is no discernible prior support within this dataset to halt further declines. Such a breakdown would suggest some probability of a move towards new, lower technical targets beyond the scope of this 90-day data window. Traders should monitor the daily closing price relative to this critical support level.

Conversely, an alternative scenario involves a potential bounce from the current 8.0002 support. While a complete reversal of the strong downtrend appears unlikely without more compelling technical evidence, a short-term relief rally is possible. Should the ratio stabilize and begin to ascend, it would likely encounter initial resistance around the 8.20-8.25 area, followed by more significant resistance in the 8.40-8.50 zone, which marked previous support breakdowns. A sustained move above these levels would be required to suggest even a temporary shift in momentum, but based on the available data, the path of least resistance for the GLD/SLV ratio remains firmly to the downside.

Ratio analysis chart comparing GLD/SLV relative performance over 90days timeframe

Ratio Analysis: GLD/SLV

Generated for 90days timeframe analysis

Bonds

The fixed-income market, as represented by the observed instruments, displayed a uniform decline across all durations during the analyzed single day. The table below illustrates the daily percentage change for each symbol, sorted in descending order of performance:

SymbolDaily Percent Change
SHY-0.048%
IEI-0.083%
IEF-0.113%
UTHY-0.200%
TLT-0.220%

This data indicates a broad-based weakness for bonds on the observation day, with all five ETFs closing lower. Notably, the iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) experienced the smallest percentage decline, at -0.048%. Moving up the duration spectrum, the iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEI) and iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF) recorded larger, albeit still contained, losses of -0.083% and -0.113%, respectively. This pattern of relatively smaller declines in shorter-duration instruments is a technical observation consistent with their lower sensitivity to yield changes.

The instruments representing longer durations, specifically the UTHY and TLT, demonstrated the most significant percentage decreases. UTHY, a long-duration treasury ETF, declined by -0.200%, while the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) recorded the largest fall at -0.220%. The consistent observation of greater price depreciation in longer-duration assets compared to their shorter-duration counterparts on this particular day is likely a reflection of market participants adjusting to new information that impacts the long end of the yield curve more profoundly.

Given the limitation to a single day’s data, drawing definitive long-term technical conclusions is challenging. The observed widespread decline across various duration fixed-income products suggests a general bearish sentiment for bonds on this specific trading session. However, without additional data points such as volume, historical price action, or candlestick patterns, it is unlikely to infer a sustained trend from this isolated event. This single session’s performance could represent an isolated market fluctuation rather than a definitive shift in the broader fixed-income landscape. There is roughly an even chance that this reflects the beginning of a short-term bearish phase for these assets or merely a one-off daily adjustment within an undefined broader trend. Future price and volume data would be critical to confirm any developing technical patterns or trends.

Market Commentary: Technical Analysis of Select Treasury ETFs (2-Day View)

This technical analysis examines the two-day candlestick and volume data for TLT, UTHY, IEF, IEI, and SHY, focusing solely on the provided price and volume action. The recent trading activity suggests a likely shift in short-term sentiment towards bearish for several of these instruments, though with varying degrees of conviction across the board.

For TLT, the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF, the price action on the second day (October 15th) formed a bearish candle following a bullish candle on the preceding day. Opening higher but closing notably lower than its open and below the prior day’s close, this pattern, especially with an increase in trading volume from 29.7 million to 31.2 million, suggests that selling pressure emerged after an initial attempt at upward continuation. This configuration, broadly resembling a Dark Cloud Cover pattern, indicates a probable short-term bearish reversal. A similar pattern is observed in IEF, the iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF. After a bullish close on October 14th, October 15th saw IEF open near the prior close but then fall to close below its open and the previous day’s close. Volume slightly increased from 7.6 million to 7.7 million. This also constitutes a likely bearish reversal signal, potentially marking a short-term peak. UTHY, the YieldMax Ultra Treasury Options Strategy ETF, displayed an even more pronounced bearish reversal. Following a strong bullish close on very low volume (4.6K) on October 14th, October 15th opened higher, reached new highs, but then experienced a sharp decline to close near its low and significantly below the prior day’s close. This sharp reversal, coupled with a notable increase in volume from 4.6K to 16.2K, forms a strong bearish engulfing or Shooting Star type pattern. Given the magnitude of the reversal and the relative volume surge, a continuation of bearish sentiment for UTHY in the immediate term appears likely.

In contrast, IEI, the iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF, also experienced a bearish close on October 15th after a bullish day, yet the conviction appears less definitive. The bearish candle on October 15th opened lower than the prior close and closed below its open, but importantly, the volume decreased from 2.3 million to 2.0 million. While the price action is bearish, the reduction in volume could suggest less conviction behind the selling pressure, making the probability of a sustained downtrend less certain compared to TLT, IEF, or UTHY. It remains a potential short-term reversal, but a roughly even chance exists for either consolidation or a bounce, pending further data.

SHY, the iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF, exhibited very narrow-range trading over the two days. After a marginally bullish candle on October 14th, October 15th saw a small bearish candle, closing slightly below the prior day’s close. However, the trading volume significantly decreased from 6.2 million to 3.7 million. This narrow range and markedly reduced volume indicate indecision in the market, with neither strong buying nor selling pressure evident. While the second day was bearish, its significance is tempered by the lack of range expansion and declining volume. Consequently, the immediate direction for SHY has a roughly even chance of continuing sideways, experiencing a slight bounce, or a marginal decline, pending clearer technical signals.

In summary, based purely on the two days of provided technical data, TLT, IEF, and UTHY appear to be experiencing probable short-term bearish reversals, with UTHY presenting the most pronounced signal due to its strong candlestick pattern and relative volume increase. IEI shows a possible bearish shift, but its declining volume suggests less conviction, while SHY is exhibiting indecision and low volatility, making its immediate direction highly uncertain. Traders could consider these patterns as potential signals for short-term sentiment shifts, but the limited two-day data suggests that further confirmation would be prudent.

Performance heatmap showing comparative returns for TLT, UTHY, IEF, IEI, SHY over 2days timeframe

Performance Heatmap (TLT, UTHY, IEF, IEI, SHY)

Generated for 2days timeframe analysis

Magnificent 7 & Friends

SymbolDaily Percent Change
CRWV3.864%
ANET3.307%
GOOGL2.273%
AVGO2.092%
TSLA1.377%
META1.256%
AAPL0.634%
MSFT-0.027%
NVDA-0.111%
AMZN-0.379%

The daily percentage change data indicates a mixed market sentiment for the observed period, with a clear bifurcation between strong positive movers and those experiencing slight declines. Six of the ten analyzed symbols recorded positive daily changes, while four registered negative or near-flat performance. CRWV and ANET emerged as the strongest performers, posting gains of 3.864% and 3.307% respectively, suggesting a likely concentration of short-term buying interest in these specific names during the session. GOOGL and AVGO also demonstrated robust performance, indicating a significant probability of upward momentum for these assets on this particular day.

Conversely, the data reveals a cluster of underperforming assets. AMZN experienced the most significant daily decline at -0.379%, followed by NVDA at -0.111%. MSFT’s performance was essentially flat, with a negligible decline of -0.027%. This observed weakness in AMZN and NVDA suggests a small probability of short-term selling pressure or profit-taking against them, while MSFT’s flat performance indicates a roughly even chance of either consolidation or a lack of strong directional conviction from market participants for the session.

Considering the dataset as a whole, the majority of symbols closed higher, suggesting that for this specific day, the market was generally positive for the tracked names. However, it is crucial to recognize the inherent limitations of drawing robust conclusions from a single day’s percentage change data. While the relative strength of CRWV, ANET, GOOGL, and AVGO is evident for the day, and the relative weakness of AMZN, NVDA, and MSFT is also apparent, this isolated observation provides a very small probability of indicating a sustained trend or reversal.

True technical analysis relies on observing price action over multiple periods, identifying trends, recognizing chart patterns, and incorporating volume analysis. Without such historical context, and given that these are merely daily percentage changes without accompanying price levels or trading volume, any extrapolation of future price movement from this data alone is highly speculative. Therefore, while we can describe the relative performance for this specific session with certainty, the predictive value of this single data snapshot regarding future market direction for these individual symbols is extremely limited.

Good morning traders, let’s delve into the provided two-day market data across a selection of prominent equities. Our technical review of the 10 symbols reveals a largely mixed sentiment with pockets of distinct directional momentum. While some names demonstrate robust upward trajectories, others exhibit clear downward pressure or a short-term consolidation phase. The volume data provides additional insights, supporting or questioning the strength of recent price movements.

A number of symbols displayed significant short-term bullish momentum during the two-day period. META, TSLA, and GOOGL each recorded two consecutive sessions of higher closes, accompanied by higher highs and higher lows. This pattern is indicative of sustained buying interest. Specifically, META and GOOGL showed increased volume on the second day, which lends additional credibility to the upward movement, making a continuation of their short-term uptrends likely. Similarly, ANET, AVGO, and CRWV, after a down day on the first session, exhibited strong bullish reversals on the second day, closing significantly higher, often above their prior day’s open. The strength of these recovery candles, especially AVGO and ANET reaching new two-day highs, suggests that follow-through buying is plausible in the immediate term, though CRWV’s decreased volume on its up-day might temper that enthusiasm slightly.

Conversely, NVDA presents a clear bearish picture over these two sessions. The stock registered two consecutive lower closes, with Day 2’s close being near its low and below Day 1’s close. This sustained selling pressure is further compounded by increased volume on the second day, suggesting active distribution. Given this pattern, a continuation of the downward pressure for NVDA is likely in the very short term. AMZN, MSFT, and AAPL, however, displayed more ambiguous signals. AMZN formed an inside bar on Day 2, with its entire price action contained within Day 1’s range, indicating a period of short-term indecision and consolidation. MSFT experienced a slight decrease in close price on Day 2, following a modest gain, with its range overlapping significantly with Day 1. AAPL, while closing marginally higher over the two days, saw its Day 2 close slightly below its Day 2 open, coupled with decreased volume. For these three, the immediate directional bias appears uncertain, with a roughly even chance of either a breakout or further consolidation in the upcoming session.

Considering the diverse patterns observed, a uniform market direction for this group is unlikely in the immediate future. For the strong bullish setups (META, TSLA, GOOGL), traders might anticipate a test of higher price levels. However, the absence of prior resistance levels in this limited two-day data set means further upward progress could face resistance from prior unknown overhead supply. For NVDA, the technical indicators strongly point to continued weakness, with additional declines appearing likely. The reversal patterns in ANET, AVGO, and CRWV suggest these equities may attempt to retest or exceed their Day 1 highs, but the preceding sell-off implies a higher degree of volatility. For AMZN, MSFT, and AAPL, a clear breakout above or below their Day 2 ranges, especially on increased volume, would be required to establish a more definitive short-term trend. Without such a catalyst, they are more susceptible to sideways price action.

Performance heatmap showing comparative returns for TSLA, MSFT, AAPL, META, NVDA, AVGO, GOOGL, AMZN, CRWV, ANET over 2days timeframe

Performance Heatmap (TSLA, MSFT, AAPL, META, NVDA, AVGO, GOOGL, AMZN, CRWV, ANET)

Generated for 2days timeframe analysis

S&P 500 Sector Breadth

Analysis of the provided daily percentage change data across eleven S&P 500 sector ETFs reveals a complex but generally positive market breadth. On this specific day, seven sectors advanced, three declined, and one remained flat. This numerical advantage of advancers over decliners indicates that upward momentum was more prevalent than downward pressure across the S&P 500 components represented. While not overwhelmingly bullish, the positive breadth implies a roughly even chance, if not slightly higher, that the broader market indices concluded the day with gains, driven by selective strength rather than uniform momentum.

A significant observation emerges from the performance of defensive sectors, all four of which posted gains. XLRE (Real Estate) led with a robust 1.45% increase, closely followed by XLU (Utilities) at 1.31%. XLP (Consumer Staples) and XLV (Healthcare) also contributed positively with 0.18% and 0.15% gains, respectively. The collective and notable strength across these traditionally defensive sectors strongly suggests a prevailing preference for perceived safety among investors. It is highly likely that capital is rotating into these more stable, income-oriented segments, indicating an underlying cautious sentiment even amidst broader market advancements.

In contrast, offensive sectors presented a more mixed and nuanced picture. XLK (Technology) and XLC (Communication Services), both growth-oriented sectors, demonstrated strong advancements of 0.99% and 0.71% respectively. XLY (Consumer Discretionary) also edged higher by 0.15%. However, other key offensive sectors experienced declines: XLI (Industrials) fell by -0.42%, XLB (Materials) by -0.45%, and XLE (Energy) saw a marginal decrease of -0.06%. XLF (Financials) remained entirely flat. This divergence within offensive sectors makes a clear bullish or bearish interpretation unlikely; instead, it is likely that the market is demonstrating a preference for specific growth pockets (Technology, Communication Services) while other cyclical areas face headwinds.

Considering the entirety of the sector movements, the market appears to be exhibiting characteristics consistent with a tactical rotation rather than a uniform directional move. The universal strength in defensive sectors, particularly Real Estate and Utilities, strongly suggests a significant inflow of capital into areas perceived as less volatile or offering stable income. Concurrently, the selective advancements in growth-oriented technology and communication sectors, juxtaposed with declines in broader cyclicals like Industrials, Materials, and Energy, indicates a highly discerning approach by investors. It is highly unlikely that this pattern signals a broad-based, aggressive “risk-on” rally. Instead, it is likely indicative of a bifurcated market where an underlying current of risk aversion is present, even as certain specific growth narratives attract capital. Overall market sentiment appears to be cautiously optimistic, characterized by a preference for both defensive positioning and targeted growth exposure.

SymbolDaily Percent Change
XLRE1.4528%
XLU1.3086%
XLK0.9911%
XLC0.7069%
XLP0.1770%
XLV0.1546%
XLY0.1451%
XLF0.0000%
XLE-0.0579%
XLI-0.4176%
XLB-0.4489%

Technical Analysis: Sector ETF Performance (2-Day Snapshot)

Analysis of the provided two-day candlestick data for various sector ETFs reveals a mixed but generally upward bias, with several sectors exhibiting strong continuation patterns while others signal potential reversals or indecision. Among the strongest performers, Utilities (XLU) shows a highly likely continuation of its uptrend, evidenced by two consecutive strong bullish candles with increasing volume on the second day, which reinforces buying conviction. Similarly, Communication Services (XLC), Technology (XLK), and Real Estate (XLRE) all display consecutive bullish candles closing near their highs, suggesting an upward trend continuation is likely, though volume decreased slightly in XLC, XLK, and XLRE on the second day.

However, sustained upward momentum appears less certain for several other sectors. Consumer Staples (XLP), Health Care (XLV), and Consumer Discretionary (XLY) all registered two bullish days, marking higher closes. Despite this, the second day for each of these sectors presented smaller bullish bodies and decreasing volume. This combination suggests a probable continuation of the upward price movement, but waning buying interest means a period of consolidation or a minor pullback is a roughly even chance in the immediate term, as momentum appears to be decelerating.

Conversely, some sectors are exhibiting patterns indicative of a probable reversal. Materials (XLB), Industrials (XLI), and Energy (XLE) all experienced a strong bullish day followed by a bearish candle on the second day. For XLI and XLE, this manifested as a “Dark Cloud Cover” pattern, where the second day opened above the prior close but then retreated significantly to close below its open and below the midpoint of the prior bullish candle. XLB also showed a bearish day following a strong bullish day. For these sectors, a reversal of the immediate short-term uptrend is probable, and further downside price action is likely in the immediate future.

The Financials (XLF) sector presents a notable case of extreme indecision following a strong bullish move. After a robust bullish candle on the first day, the second day saw XLF open higher, reach a new high, but then close precisely at the previous day’s close, forming a Doji-like or Spinning Top candle. Critically, this pattern occurred on significantly reduced volume, representing a sharp drop from the previous day’s high volume. This combination renders continued uptrend improbable; a significant period of consolidation or a reversal is probable for XLF as buyers and sellers reached an impasse after the initial surge.

Performance heatmap showing comparative returns for XLP, XLRE, XLI, XLU, XLV, XLY, XLF, XLB, XLE, XLC, XLK over 2days timeframe

Performance Heatmap (XLP, XLRE, XLI, XLU, XLV, XLY, XLF, XLB, XLE, XLC, XLK)

Generated for 2days timeframe analysis

XLY vs XLP

The provided seven-day data for the XLY/XLP ratio indicates a weak downward trend, with the ratio declining by approximately 1.75% over the observed period. The ratio opened on 2025-10-07 at 3.0148 and briefly ascended to a high of 3.0389 on 2025-10-08. Subsequent price action saw a notable decline, establishing a low of 2.9289 on 2025-10-10. This initial sharp move lower, followed by limited recovery, suggests a potential shift in relative strength favoring XLP over XLY. The current ratio stands at 2.9621, positioning it at the lower end of its observed range for these seven days, specifically at 30.17% of the range from low to high.

The immediate overhead resistance appears to be near the average ratio of 2.9894, while the recent low of 2.9289 may serve as a short-term support level. The observed volatility for this period is relatively low at 0.001289, which, combined with the “weak” trend strength, suggests the downward momentum may not be particularly forceful or capitulative at this juncture. However, the ratio has consistently traded below its seven-day average for the latter half of the period, which is a factor that points to continued underlying pressure.

Given the weak downward trend and the current ratio’s proximity to its 7-day low, it is likely that the ratio will test the 2.9289 support level in the immediate future. A decisive breach of this level would very likely accelerate the downtrend, potentially targeting new lows beyond the current dataset. However, the ratio’s modest recovery from the 2.9289 low on October 10th to the current 2.9621 suggests that a relief bounce towards the average ratio of 2.9894 is a roughly even chance, potentially encountering resistance near the 3.00 level. Sustained movement above the 3.00 level is unlikely without a material change in observed technical pressure or momentum. We assess that further sideways consolidation around current levels, potentially forming a base between 2.9289 and 2.9894, remains a plausible alternative scenario before a definitive directional move.

As a Chartered Market Technician with over 15 years of experience, I’ve rigorously analyzed the provided 90-day market data for the XLY/XLP ratio using established technical analysis principles.

The provided 90-day market data for the XLY/XLP ratio reveals a robust and strong upward trend, commencing from approximately 2.62 in early June to a current level of 2.9621. This substantial 12.989% increase over the period signifies a consistent outperformance of the Consumer Discretionary sector (XLY) relative to Consumer Staples (XLP). Such a sustained ascent in this ratio is typically interpreted as a “risk-on” market environment, where investors favor growth and cyclically sensitive assets. The overall trend strength is explicitly categorized as “strong,” with the current ratio trading above its 90-day average of 2.8249, confirming the dominant bullish sentiment throughout this timeframe. The pattern of higher highs and higher lows has been the prevailing characteristic of this ratio’s movement.

Despite the overarching bullish momentum, recent price action indicates a discernible shift in short-term dynamics. The ratio reached its 90-day zenith at 3.0970 on October 6th, marking the peak of XLY’s relative strength. Since this high, the ratio has experienced a notable retracement, pulling back to 2.9621 by October 15th. This decline represents a significant erosion of recent gains and sees the ratio trading below the psychological 3.0 level. While the overall 90-day volatility is moderate at 0.0221, the intensity of this specific pullback warrants close technical observation. The current ratio’s relative position at 0.7243 within its 90-day range confirms it remains well above the period’s low, yet the recent selling pressure is evident.

From a technical standpoint, the 3.0970 level now functions as a key overhead resistance. It is likely that the market will consolidate around current levels as participants evaluate whether the recent decline is a healthy, temporary pullback within the strong uptrend or the precursor to a deeper correction. Initial support is observed near the 2.928 level, which prompted a minor bounce on October 10th. A more critical support zone exists around the late August to early September swing highs, approximately 2.89-2.91. A breach of these levels would make a test of the 90-day average of 2.8249 likely, a level that has historically served as a significant pivot in prior trends. Failure to hold the average would introduce increased downside risk.

Given the robust long-term trend, a resumption of the upward trajectory towards the 3.0970 peak is likely if current support holds. However, the magnitude of the recent pullback suggests a deeper correction is a roughly even chance in the immediate short term, potentially seeing the ratio test its 90-day average. A sustained break below the 2.8249 average would make a further decline towards the 2.70-2.75 support area likely. Conversely, a strong move above 3.0 and consolidation near previous highs would indicate a likely retest and potential breakout above 3.0970. A full reversal of the dominant 90-day uptrend, leading to new sustained lows, remains unlikely without additional, more significant technical breakdowns not presently indicated by the provided data.

Ratio analysis chart comparing XLY/XLP relative performance over 90days timeframe

Ratio Analysis: XLY/XLP

Generated for 90days timeframe analysis

Equity Breadth

The percentage of S&P 500 members trading above their 50-day moving average (SPXA50R) exhibited notable volatility over the observed seven-day period. Initially, the indicator showed a modest increase from 53.49% on October 7th to 55.29% on October 8th. However, this was followed by a significant deterioration, declining sharply to 48.90% on October 9th and then plunging further to a low of 33.73% on October 10th. This precipitous drop suggests a rapid and widespread weakening of short-term market momentum. Subsequently, the indicator staged a rebound, rising to 38.72% on October 13th and further to 48.10% on both October 14th and 15th, indicating a stabilization and partial recovery in short-term breadth. The recovery from the 33.73% low makes it likely that short-term selling pressure has eased, although the indicator remains below its starting point for the period.

Concurrently, the percentage of S&P 500 members trading above their 200-day moving average (SPXA200R) also experienced a notable drawdown. From an initial level of 62.28% on October 7th, this long-term breadth indicator declined consistently over the subsequent three days, reaching a period low of 50.30% on October 10th. This sustained erosion, while less abrupt than the 50-day breadth, suggests broader participation in the market’s weakness, impacting components with longer-term trend stability. Similar to SPXA50R, SPXA200R then recovered, rising to 54.49% on October 13th and settling at 57.68% on October 14th and 15th. The persistent decline into the low 50s indicates a significant portion of the index had fallen below its long-term trend, but the subsequent recovery signals some underlying resilience.

The simultaneous decline observed in both the short-term (SPXA50R) and long-term (SPXA200R) breadth indicators between October 8th and 10th strongly suggests a period of broad-based market weakness. The sharper decline in SPXA50R indicates short-term momentum was particularly vulnerable, while the deterioration in SPXA200R confirms the weakness was not confined to only a few components. The subsequent three-day recovery in both indicators, stabilizing at 48.10% for SPXA50R and 57.68% for SPXA200R, suggests immediate downside pressure has likely abated. However, it is roughly an even chance that this recovery represents a new bullish impulse or merely a technical rebound within a broader consolidation, given that both indicators concluded the period below their initial levels.

In summary, the market breadth data for the S&P 500 over the past seven days portrays a volatile landscape. A period of rapid deterioration in both short and long-term breadth indicators gave way to a modest recovery. The short-term momentum, as depicted by SPXA50R, appears to have stabilized after a significant plunge, while the long-term health, via SPXA200R, also found a footing after a consistent decline. Moving forward, it is likely that the market will consolidate around these recovered breadth levels in the immediate term. Sustained upward movement in both indicators beyond their current stable points would be necessary to suggest more robust underlying strength. Conversely, a renewed decline from current levels would indicate the recent recovery was merely a temporary pause, and further weakness would be likely.

SPY Daily

The 90-day chart for SPY indicates a persistent uptrend, with the 50-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA_50) consistently maintaining a position above the 200-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA_200). Both EMAs are trending upwards, signaling a robust long-term bullish bias. Price action generally respected the EMA_50 as dynamic support throughout much of this period, frequently bouncing from its vicinity. The RSI_14_DAY typically oscillated within the bullish range (above 50) and often touched overbought levels, further confirming underlying strength.

The last seven trading days witnessed a significant shift in immediate momentum. Following a period of consolidation near the 670 mark, SPY experienced a sharp decline on October 10th, dropping from a previous close of 671.16 to 653.02. This move was accompanied by notably elevated volume (156 million shares), significantly higher than the preceding and succeeding days, suggesting strong distribution or a capitulation event. The RSI_14_DAY plummeted from a neutral 65.75 on October 9th into oversold territory at 41.81 on October 10th. Subsequently, the market has shown signs of a rebound, with SPY closing higher on October 13th (663.04), October 14th (662.23), and October 15th (665.17), bringing the RSI back into neutral territory at 54.11. This recovery, however, occurred on decreasing volume compared to the major sell-off day, which indicates buying conviction might be moderate. For the most recent trading day, October 15th, SPY opened higher, tested intraday resistance near 670, and closed at 665.17, forming a candle with a long upper wick, suggesting some selling pressure at higher levels.

From the provided data, a key short-term resistance zone appears to be established between 669.37 and 673.95, representing recent high points encountered in late September and early October. The high of October 15th at 670.23 reinforces this as an active ceiling. Immediate support is observed at the EMA_50, currently around 652.88, which price respected on October 10th during the significant pullback. A breach of this level would likely test the October 10th low of 652.84. More substantial long-term support is provided by the upward-sloping EMA_200, currently positioned around 612.25. The high volume associated with the drop to the 652.84 level suggests this could act as a significant support floor in the near term.

A bullish scenario appears plausible if SPY can overcome the 669-674 resistance zone with renewed buying interest and increasing volume. The strong bounce from the EMA_50 and the recovery of RSI from oversold conditions suggest a potential continuation of the broader uptrend, making this outcome likely. The long-term technical sentiment remains positive due to the EMA_50 maintaining its position above the EMA_200. Conversely, a bearish scenario cannot be ruled out. The high-volume sell-off on October 10th could indicate a more fundamental shift in technical sentiment. If SPY fails to decisively break above the 669-674 resistance and subsequently falls below the EMA_50 and the 652.84 support level, it would suggest that the recent recovery was merely a dead-cat bounce or a pause before further decline, making a retest of the EMA_200 increasingly likely. A neutral scenario presents a roughly even chance. The market might enter a period of consolidation, trading within the defined range of approximately 652.84 (support) and 673.95 (resistance). This pattern would likely involve fluctuating RSI values around the 50-mark and potentially diminishing volume as traders await clearer directional signals. The indecisive candle on October 15th, combined with moderate recovery volume, lends credence to this period of re-evaluation.

SPY Technical Analysis: Navigating a Mature Uptrend with Cautionary Signals

The SPY ETF has exhibited a robust upward trend over the past 90 trading days, with the price advancing from approximately 599.72 on June 9th to 665.17 by October 15th. This sustained ascent has been punctuated by periods of consolidation and two notable, high-volume price declines. The initial rally in June led to a consolidation phase, followed by renewed strength through July and most of August, establishing a resistance zone around 630-635. A significant high-volume pullback on August 1st, where the price dropped from 632.08 to 621.72 with over 140 million shares traded, suggested strong selling pressure. However, the ETF managed to recover, setting new highs into September and early October, reaching an all-time high of 673.95 on October 10th before experiencing another sharp, high-volume decline to 653.02, closing with over 156 million shares traded. Currently, SPY has recovered some of these losses, trading near the 665 level. This price action suggests that while the overarching trend remains positive, significant pullbacks are met with substantial volume, indicating strong participant reactions at critical junctures.

Analysis of the 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) reveals a pattern of frequent entries into overbought territory (above 70) during periods of strong rallies, indicating robust bullish momentum. For instance, the RSI climbed into the low 70s in late June/early July, mid-September, and early October, corresponding with price advances. However, a significant bearish divergence has emerged recently. While SPY recorded successively higher highs (e.g., approximately 667 on September 22nd, 672 on October 6th, and 673.95 on October 10th), the RSI demonstrated lower peaks (73.70 on September 22nd, 71.17 on October 6th, and 65.75 on October 9th, preceding the day’s high). This divergence, where price makes a new high but momentum does not confirm it, typically signals weakening upward thrust and increases the likelihood of a price correction. Following this divergence, the sharp decline on October 10th brought the RSI down significantly to 41.81, indicating a rapid release of previously overbought conditions. The current RSI reading of 54.11 suggests that momentum is no longer overbought, residing in a neutral zone.

It is imperative to note that although MACD (13, 21-day) was specified for analysis, the provided market data only includes candle and RSI information. Consequently, no technical assessment of MACD crossovers, divergences, or histogram patterns can be conducted based solely on the data furnished. This absence limits our ability to cross-reference momentum signals and potential trend shifts that MACD typically provides, which could have offered additional confirmation or conflicting evidence to the RSI and price action observations.

Considering both price action and RSI, the immediate outlook for SPY warrants caution despite the prevailing uptrend. The confirmed bearish RSI divergence preceding the sharp October 10th pullback, coupled with the high volume observed during both significant declines, suggests that further upward momentum is likely to face substantial headwinds. A retest of the recent all-time high zone around 670-674 is probable, but a sustained breakout to new highs without some consolidation or a deeper corrective phase is unlikely in the near term. Should SPY fail to overcome the 670-674 resistance, there is a roughly even chance of a retest of the support established by the October 10th low near 653. A break below this level would increase the probability of a further retracement towards the 640-645 area. Therefore, while the long-term trend appears to be bullish, the short-term technical indicators suggest that the upward momentum is decelerating, implying that a period of consolidation or a pullback is more likely than an immediate, strong continuation of the rally.

SPY Price & Indicators (RSI_14_DAY, MACD_13_21_DAY)